Archive for the ‘Latest News’ Category

>Chelsea Clinton “Delighted” To Be On TV – Since When, Exactly?

Monday, December 12th, 2011

Woke up. It was a Chelsea evening and the first thing that I heard was myself saying, “Whaaa?” Chelsea Clinton, avoider-in-chief of all things media just made her debut as a “special correspondent” for both NBC Nightly News with Brian Williams and the prime time program, Rock Center.

When news of her appointment at NBC first broke I was in the middle of one of those family crises that puts everything in perspective. The new me realized: life and death = important. Plum media job goes to former off limits first child who as an adult shuns media with open disdain = whatever.

But now that I’ve seen it, I’m sorry, the old me is back and has to comment.

Billed now as a “broadcast journalist,” Chelsea, Clinton is, in fact, a PhD candidate who once expressed an interest in studying medicine.

Well, television is not, as they say, brain surgery. But it is more difficult than it looks. Those who effortlessly communicate intelligently and effectively on television make it look easy and that makes just about anyone think, “I can do that.” I hate to break it to about 85 percent of you, but you can’t.

If you don’t know how to communicate with people you cannot “do” television. You can have the best writers, the coolest photographers, the craftiest editors, and the savviest producers, but if you don’t know how to follow your gut or get other people to spill theirs, or how to look into that camera and talk so people will listen, then you can’t do television. Not even the “special” stories that Chelsea (or her NBC colleague Jenna Bush Hager) is assigned.

Chelsea, who when this appointment by NBC was announced, refused to comment to the media, is now on television and “delighted to be here.” Why does someone so smart not see the irony? How can she not see the difficulty of her audience in trusting the message of one who so hates the medium?

Immersed in my recent crisis and surrounded by actual surgeons, I had many questions all coming down to trust. Can I trust you with my loved one’s future? Do I trust you to tell me all the risks?

We can’t all know how to do everything. Someone has to fix the car. Some has to build the rockets. Someone has to perform the life-saving surgery. We have to be smart enough to know what we don’t know, ask the right questions, and when to let those who do know do their best.

I wish Chelsea were smart enough to know what she doesn’t know.

Felicia Knight is President of Knight Vision International, LLC

Image by Natalie Maynor

>A Second Life for the GOP Candidates?

Wednesday, October 19th, 2011

Knight Vision International’s Felicia Knight offers her opinion on a “second life” for the current GOP presidential candidates in this posting on “The Wrap.”

>Play to Win or Don’t Play at All: What I Learned from the 2011 Boston Red Sox

Wednesday, October 12th, 2011

Here in Red Sox Nation, most people have dried their tears, put away their beer koozies, swapped out their red and white for their yellow and black, and told their seven-year-old children to buck up; they don’t know what real suffering is.

To the post-2004 generation, “Wait ’til next year” isn’t a phrase fraught with generational despair and chronic disappointment. It’s now something we say if the Pats should lose in the playoffs or the Bruins fail to bring home the Stanley Cup. We’ve so recently drunk the champagne, it’s no big deal. (The Celtics, meanwhile, are AWOL with the rest of the NBA.)

Still, the September slide of 2011, presided over by the same management team and some of the same players who brought us a World Championship in 2004 (while also coming from a 3-0 ALCS deficit to sweep the next four games from the Yankees) and another in 2007, was painful to watch. What the heck happened?

In an excellent piece of reporting, the Boston Globe’s Bob Hohler connects the dots that led to the downward trajectory.

To sum up, hubris, laziness, indifference, lost focus, lack of leadership, and too much beer and fried chicken. (While beer and chicken may have been rocket fuel for Wade Boggs, they apparently were more like Sterno for Lackey, Lester, and Beckett.) All this and a $161 million payroll to boot.

Sweet.

It’s easy, not to mention fun, to hurl insults at a group of grown men being paid fairy tale money to play a game they are expected to play better than most anyone. It’s easy, and even more fun, to deride their arrogant disrespect for the game and us, the fans.

Not so fun, is to turn the questions back on ourselves and our own professional practices.
> Do we get cocky?
> Do we get lazy?
> Do we ever lose focus?
> Do we always provide the leadership necessary to inspire our best work and that of colleagues?
> Do we ever bring in beer and fried chicken when crudités and iced tea would have been more appropriate?

If you’re lucky enough to be signed to an $82.5 million contract, you’re probably not reading this blog looking for tips on best business practices (If you are, can I interest you in hiring a PR firm?), but you probably are in the business world. People are always applying sports metaphors to life and I admit it’s depressing to listen to some facilitator with markers and flip charts drone on about “playing to win” and giving “110%.” It’s more depressing, however, to lose a contract or a job because of complacency, indifference, or laziness.

So, let the 2011 Red Sox be a wakeup call. Step away from the fried chicken, put down the beer, look in the mirror and ask, “Is it next year?”

Felicia Knight is President of Knight Vision International, LLC

Image by Andrew Malone

>Presidential Politics: More Seasoning, Hold the Greens

Friday, September 2nd, 2011

When a newly hired co-worker once asked me, “What was Hitler’s first name?” I thought she was joking. So I joked back, “Rafe.” “No, that doesn’t sound right,” she puzzled. Then I knew. Beyond the fact that she was mind-numbingly numb, I knew that 1. She would eventually work at a network (she did), and B. Her hiring was not an aberration. It was a trend. At that time, newsrooms across the country were quietly hiring younger and cheaper, and favoring those seeking experience over those who already had it. “Experience only” newsrooms were opening their doors to “entry level.”

So, it shouldn’t surprise me to learn that the entry level model has made its way up the media food chain. It’s one thing to send the newbies off to the planning board meeting and hope they come back with the goods. It’s quite another to let them board the presidential campaign bus and cross their fingers. Yes, we now have entry level reporters covering the presidential campaign. No, they’re not blogging for their college papers, they’re reporting on the race for leader of the free world for CBS, NBC, and National Journal, some of the most vaunted, venerable news organizations in the world. According to the New York Times, these young journalists aren’t interns. They aren’t assistants. They’re correspondents. They are on the bus. They are charged with sifting through the spin, the shouting, the hyperbole, the points and counterpoints, the finger wagging, the threats and promises to find the truth.

I’m all for mentoring and helping those who come behind us and all that. But may I just say this is a bad idea? I write as a former political reporter, former communications director in the political arena, and current public relations professional. It’s hard enough to guide a young reporter through the nuanced mechanics, rules, and ethics of journalism, let alone school them in the relentless grind and myriad landmines of a presidential campaign.

Politics is a contact sport played by people who want to win. And win you over. I want someone on the bus with a little seasoning and a little skepticism, not someone who needs to be counseled not to Tweet at will. As a citizen, I want my presidential campaign news gathered by someone who wasn’t a ‘tween during Bush v Gore. I want someone who knows that the Electoral College isn’t a safety school.

From the Times article:
“I thought I’m going to have to develop a personality,” said Lindsey Boerma, 23, whose biggest assignment before writing for National Journal was as editor of the Pepperdine University student paper. “But we’re not providing commentary, we’re providing coverage. And you’ve got to find that line. I haven’t quite figured it out yet.”

Really? You haven’t figured it out yet? If we sew your mittens to your sleeves will that allay some of your anxiety? Granted, I don’t know the full context of that quote, and I don’t know this young woman personally, but a presidential campaign doesn’t afford the time to “figure it out.” Yes, you get to ride the bus, but you still have to keep up.

I know I’m painting with a broad brush here. There may be some 23-year-olds out there who are fantastically well-equipped to be on this beat, but this move by these media outlets isn’t about giving great opportunities to gifted young journalists. It’s about saving money. It’s a disservice to the citizenry, the candidates, and the young people themselves who are put in a position for which they most likely are not ready.

In the end, you get what you pay for. Which is why fewer people are paying for what some of these news operations are offering.

Felicia Knight is President of Knight Vision International, LLC

Image by Kate*

>Class Act: How to Market Your College Grad Self

Tuesday, June 14th, 2011

When recent college grads read articles such as a New York Times story slugged: Many With New College Degree Find the Job Market Humbling, they realize that jumping into a high-paying, compelling career isn’t going to happen the day after they Frisbee their mortarboards across the commons.

The economy remains in the doldrums, almost every business has shrunk its workforce, and – as an actor friend of mine recently lamented – everyone knows they can hire you for next to nothing. According to OnlineDegrees.org, some of the best paying (non-CEO) jobs in 2011 seem to be held by aerospace, computer, nuclear, and petroleum engineers; airline pilots; judges; and financial and education managers. But this list represents positions populated mostly by 40- and 50-something experts, not by someone who still has fond memories of last Halloween’s epic kegger at Delta Kappa Zeta-Jones.

So, what do you do if you have, for example, a BA degree in English with a minor in the art of hip-hop turntable mixing (you can actually study “turntabalism” at Berklee College of Music in Boston)? Well… you could try teaching grammar to nightclub DJs, or you could gather up your education and life-experience strengths and showcase them to potential employers.

Beware, however, of the common job application and interview pitfalls:

1. Forgetting to turn on spell-check. There is zero excuse for your cover letter or résumé to contain misspellings. Misspelled words show that you don’t care, that you’re sloppy, and that you can’t be trusted to present a company in its best light.

2. Listing. Every. Single. Job. You’ve. Held. Since. Tenth. Grade. Your time “managing sno-cone distribution” at the Dairy-Go-Round was no doubt character building, but it’s irrelevant to an employer. Think of what your resume will look like in ten years – that Dairy-Go-Round job won’t be on it, so it shouldn’t be there now.

3. Presenting a boilerplate cover letter. Sure, your “goal is to grow as an individual while helping the company achieve new heights of profitability,” and, yes, it’s obvious that your “talents would be a perfect match” for my “exciting business”… but how about doing a little research and offering some specific impressions of how your education and your non-Dairy-Go-Round experiences might dovetail with the company?

4. Forgetting to clean up your Facebook account. No prospective employer wants to see pictures from that lost Mardi Gras weekend, quotes from Eminem, or links to Anthony Weiner’s photo Tweets. Prove that you’re an adult and that you can be a worthy company ambassador. Bonus tip: make sure you’re not tagged in compromising photos on your friends’ Facebook pages.

Since we live in a visual society, photos and videos of you are a plus, particularly if they show you in action during a class assignment or a job that’s relevant to your career. For example, an iPad presentation of your college and real-life work could be impressive. Instead of “references upon request,” include references – and quotations – from notable people (professors, employers, celebutantes).

Be patient, be willing to re-locate, keep an open mind about a lesser job in the company (if you’re as good as you say you are, you’ll advance quickly), follow-up an interview with a thank-you email (or better yet, an actual snail-mail letter), and be diligent about staying in touch. And before you know it, you might be on your way to that lucrative turntabalist position aboard Carnival of the Seas.

Felicia Knight is President of Knight Vision International, LLC: www.KnightVisionInternational.com

Image: Quinn Anya

>The End of the World – Part II

Sunday, May 22nd, 2011

If you’re reading this, one of two things has happened:
A. The world has ended and you were left behind.
B. The world is still turning and we’re all still just trying to keep up.

If the answer is A, chances are you have greater immediate concerns than checking the Knight Vision International blog, such as: should you bother paying your IRS quarterlies, will that Halloween candy you bought go to waste, or how do you avoid an I Am Legend existence in the post Apocalyptic world? So, I’m betting on B. Still, if the prophesy of 1 Thessalonians is realized, I’m pretty sure that I, too, will be left behind with greater immediate concerns than writing my KVI blog, so… never put off until the end of the world that blog which can be written today.

Debating the Rapture or Harold Camping’s qualifications as a theologian is not my focus here. My expertise with Divinity begins and ends with the egg whites. I am, however, intrigued with the idea of guaranteed outcomes and what happens when the guarantee comes due. Mr. Camping has said the second coming is “100 percent guaranteed.” Yet his Rapture date of May 21 came and went and the Savior didn’t appear – as he didn’t when Camping predicted the same thing in 1994 – so now what?

From a PR standpoint, it would seem that Mr. Camping will have a lot of splainin’ to do to those who put their faith in him. But will it hurt his “brand”? Probably not. His true believers are likely to go on believing. They may even be a little relieved. I think the general public, the media, and mainstream theologians will treat him as they always have; as a curiosity, good for a chuckle and some copy that breaks the monotony of earthquake, tsunami, assassination, and war news (ironic, isn’t it?)

Aside from the trash-talking guarantees of victory that come before boxing matches, during political campaigns, or apparently prior to the Rapture, guaranteed outcomes are supposed to be such sure bets that the guarantor is highly unlikely to have reparations to pay or egg on his face. “Guaranteed 100 percent” may not have consequences when applied to predicted appearances of the Four Horsemen, but they do in business.

Guarantees can be good for business (ask LL Bean) provided you can deliver both the quality of the product or money back should it come up short. But before you extend the offer of satisfaction guaranteed, take a step back. I recently touched on taking on a job you can’t handle, but let’s get more PR specific.

Once you’re clear on a client’s goals, give an honest assessment of what’s needed to achieve them.

• Make sure the desired time line is realistic.
• Make sure the client’s expectations are realistic.
• Be honest about what you can deliver.
• Be ready to hire extra hands if the project demands them.
• Don’t tell the client only what she wants to hear. If speaking truth to power is unwelcome, then drop that client.
• If it looks like you’re going to fall short of expected goals, don’t wait until it’s too late for a course correction – and do keep the client apprised.

If, after careful and realistic planning, you make a guarantee but fail to meet expectations, be prepared to make good on that guarantee. Learn from it and move forward. It may be a hard and even expensive lesson learned, but keep it in perspective.

After all, it’s not the end of the world.

Felicia Knight is President of Knight Vision International, LLC: www.KnightVisionInternational.com

Image: Pixelated-Light

>Don’t Make Me Write About Charlie Sheen

Monday, March 21st, 2011

I thought if I waited long enough Charlie Sheen would go away.

I was certain he would implode definitively enough to keep me from having to tackle the elephantine PR nightmare in the room. But no, he will not shut up. He will not stop Tweeting or posting Webisodes, he will not stop selling out “Violent Torpedo of Truth” tours. He will not stop touting his Martian heritage, his warlock powers, nor his tiger blood.

He will not stop fascinating America.

This delusional, violent, narcissistic, drug addled man who should be incarcerated in some combination of prison, rehab, and anger-management boot camp, is instead courted for interviews and quotes by every media outlet from NBC to Aurora, Illinois cable access. He has taken “There’s no such thing as bad publicity” and turned it into a mantra for the new world order. Lindsey Lohan and Paris Hilton are Easy Bake Ovens to his Viking industrial range.

I enjoy a celebrity train wreck as much as the next person, but I’m usually not as entertained when bad behavior moves beyond shoplifting to menacing assault, attempted strangulation, and shooting one’s fiancé in the arm – no matter how “accidental.”

Many times along the Charlie Sheen path of self-destruction I’ve thought, “I pity his PR people.” In February, his longtime publicist, Stan Rosenfield, threw in the towel saying he was “unable to work effectively” with him. I’m guessing, here, but I suspect Stan – as would any PR professional – argued against Charlie doing the interview marathon that presented us with Charlie Sheen, the bug-eyed, coked up, fed up, mad as hell warlock whose braggadocio “Duh! Winning!” actually proclaimed him to be the Biggest Loser.

Surely that week of incoherent raving gibberish was a career killer, right? After all, it led to his being fired from his sitcom, atop which he sat as the highest paid actor on television. (Although the question remains, why was he fired only after insulting his boss and not years ago when he tried strangling his then wife?)

Yet here we are, weeks later, and Charlie Sheen still has not gone away. Why is the “Violent Torpedo of Truth” tour selling out? Why are a dozen more cities being added to a tour where the low-end ticket is a hundred bucks? Why are people paying $750 for a VIP “meet and greet” with this cokehead? Is it worth $750 to have a picture taken with a man whose children had to be surrendered to the police? Why is he more popular than ever?

Is he the ultimate “at least” comparison who soothes our own shortcomings? At least I don’t sleep with hookers. At least I don’t shoot cocaine. At least I don’t beat my wife. At least I don’t ignore my kids. At least I’m not as crazy as that guy.

I could almost go with that – except feeling superior to Charlie Sheen is like saying you’re a better actor than Sophia Coppola. Where’s the satisfaction in that? Besides $750 is an awfully expensive ticket to absolution.

No, I think, in the end, Charlie Sheen is simply the two-headed calf, the bearded lady, Zip and Pip, and the Elephant Man all rolled into one. He’s the circus freak show with an inflated ticket price. And as P.T. Barnum never said, “There’s a sucker born every minute.” (Now Barnum had a bad publicist.)

Felicia Knight is President of Knight Vision International, LLC: www.KnightVisionInternational.com

Image: Jedidiah44

>Overcoming A James Franco Moment

Monday, February 28th, 2011

Whether he was scared, stoned, or just plain in over his head, James Franco likely woke up the morning after co-hosting the Academy Awards® with the words of Will Ferrell ringing in his ears: “Did that go the way you thought it was gonna go? Nope.”

Franco delivered a stiff and lackluster performance behind expressions that ranged from Alfred E. Neuman to Jeff Spicoli (but without the intellectual wit) for which he was universally and mercilessly slammed. Everyone from Hollywood insiders to bloggers to water-cooler critics took their shots.

Overnight he went from Academy Award® nominee/Yale PhD candidate James Franco to suspected stoner loser.

Nope. That definitely did not go the way he thought it was gonna go.

Such hero-to-goat moments – and I’m talking about those that have nothing to do with salacious scandal – have many a big name or brand attached to them:

David Letterman, Christina Aguilera, Bill Buckner, and BP are just a few – all viewed favorably by their peers and the public as competent, even excellent, in their disciplines, but who were tripped up or brought down by circumstances, hubris, inattention to detail, a complete misreading of their audience, or a combination of all of the above.

Mistakes will happen. Not every situation can be controlled. But the minefield should be cleared to the best of everyone’s ability. The first step to overcoming a public embarrassment that can be costly to your brand is to avoid it in the first place. There are the obvious “don’ts” such as:
1. Don’t roll out the product before it’s ready
2. Don’t hide behind obstruction
3. Don’t countenance malfeasance
4. Don’t come unprepared
5. Don’t show up stoned

The less obvious “don’ts” can require some soul searching or ego busting:
6. Don’t take on a job you know deep down you can’t handle
7. Don’t let others talk you into a commitment you can’t keep
8. Don’t listen only to those who agree with you
9. Don’t listen only to those who tell you what you want to hear

But let’s say you’ve taken all the necessary steps to guard against bad reviews and crippling headlines, yet it didn’t go the way you planned. How do you get over it?

If mistakes were made, admit them. Clearly. Everyone knows what the definition of “is” is, so don’t be cute about declaring culpability. If you can inject humor appropriately, do it. The key word is “appropriately.” (David Letterman rarely lets an opportunity to deprecate his own performance at the Academy Awards® go by.)

Change the conversation by giving ’em something else to talk about. Yes, this misstep may always be part of your bio or company history, but a string of sincere, redeeming deeds, outstanding performances, excellent products, or strong reviews can relegate it to a footnote.

It’s not easy to face the world after a public hazing. But people and companies do it every day. The ones who survive and thrive learn from their mistakes and move forward.

Others get fired from Two and a Half Men.

Felicia Knight is President of Knight Vision International, LLC: www.KnightVisionInternational.com

Image: Cristal Castle

>A Remembrance of Dave Lackey

Thursday, February 17th, 2011

No advice this time on messaging or crises. No list of dos and don’ts for how to deal with media. Today I’m using this space to call attention to the death – or rather, the life – of a good friend who shared this profession and who was better at it than just about anyone.

I’ve known Dave Lackey for so long, I don’t even remember when we first met. Whenever it was, I was a reporter and he was handling communications. We were the perfect “hack vs. flack” combination. I asked necessary and sometimes bothersome questions and he gave the perfect and sometimes bothersome answers. When he didn’t have the answer, he’d get it for me.

In 1998, while Dave was Communications Director for Senator Olympia Snowe of Maine, I arrived in Washington, DC as his counterpart for Senator Susan Collins. Together, we worked through a devastating ice storm, the early days of the Monica Lewinsky scandal, the impeachment and trial of President Clinton, military action in Bosnia, two re-election campaigns for our bosses, September 11th, the war in Afghanistan, and the run up to the Iraq war. We wrote countless news releases about contracts for Bath Iron Works, trade agreements, mill closings, declarations of states of emergency, Canadian subsidized lumber, and the price of milk.

We sat together – always in the same place – at the Monday morning press secretaries meetings in the Mansfield room in the Capitol. It came to be known as “the moderate’s corner.” One morning, upon leaving that meeting, a colleague from another state asked what we were doing over an upcoming recess. I answered, “I’m going home.” His reply was, “Oh, you have to go to Maine?” Dave and I both laughed and said, “No, we get to go to Maine!”

Dave loved Maine. He worked hard for Maine. He had the respect of every political reporter I knew in Maine. He was equally respected by the Capitol Hill press corps – not an easy crowd. From the New York Times to the Rumford Times, Dave had admirers. And I was among them.

We were compatriots – but also competitors. Each of us knew the other was working as hard and fast as possible and neither of us wanted to come up short. We’d look over each other’s shoulders but also have each other’s backs. And when we didn’t, there was usually a very robust argument hashed out over a Bombay Sapphire martini (him) and a Grey Goose gibson (me) that set everything to rights. Until the next time. We used to say that one day we’d have our own PR firm. Dave said we had to, if for no other reason than that he had the perfect name for us: Knight & Dave.

A Yale man, Dave once sent me a card of condolence when he found out my niece was at Harvard. He also sent me a hyacinth when my mother died, and a bouquet of flowers when I left the Senate.

I left for another position in Washington and a few months later he left too, for a job in Boston. We stayed in touch. And then we didn’t. And when I saw him again a couple weeks ago – for what would be the last time – he was delighted to report that he was coming back to Maine to work in Augusta.

I knew he was ill. He knew I knew. We hugged each other and he asked for my card.

“Knight Vision,” he said. “Great name! Not as good as Knight & Dave, though…”

Felicia Knight is President of Knight Vision International, LLC: www.KnightVisionInternational.com

Image: William Luo

>In 2008 I Went To Cairo & Alexandria

Saturday, February 12th, 2011

Part of a delegation from the National Endowment for the Arts, I was there to help promote a small program of international cultural exchange known as The Big Read Egypt.

In preparation for my visit, I read four books by the Egyptian writer and Nobel Laureate Naguib Mahfouz, a biography of Mahfouz, as well as two contemporary novels by Egyptian author Alaa Al Aswany. All these books pulsed with an undercurrent of discontent and seethed with resentment against class struggles and government corruption and oppression. They fantasized about unrealizable futures of prosperity and freedom, and foreshadowed broken dreams of better lives. They also drew wistful, reminiscent pictures of a vibrant, powerful culture that used to be free from autocratic rule, but which existed now only in literature and memory.

I could see such an Egypt, however, when I visited the Museum of Egyptian Antiquities, the pyramids at Giza, the Sphynx, the Library of Alexandria, the American University in Cairo, Wadi Hitan (the Valley of Whales), Khan Ali-Kalili – the open market in Cairo – a mosque, a Coptic church, the American embassy – and Tahrir Square.

But in quiet, guarded conversations with students, academics, professionals, shopkeepers, reporters, writers, and taxi drivers, there was talk of few opportunities despite their educations – or because of no education – of rampant poverty, of increased oppression of women, of having no say in their politics or their futures, of life in a police state. In the last three weeks, I’ve been thinking of all these people and been in touch with a few. They are today posting and Tweeting “Mabrouk!” (Congratulations!) to themselves, their friends, their fellow revolutionaries. Some of my Egyptian friends are no longer living in Egypt, but their hearts are there.

Mubarak has stepped aside, ceding power to the military, because Egypt’s revolutionaries risked their lives – more than 300 died – by stepping into Tahrir Square. The very act of civil disobedience was difficult and dangerous. But now the really hard part begins. The people risk losing this hard-won opportunity to shape their future.

They want democracy.
They want freedom.
They want justice.

The danger now is that they expect to have them all at once and immediately. In reality, all of this will take time, patience, and restraint. It seemed like 18 days was a long time to wait for Mubarak to bow to the growing multitudes. It wasn’t. Compared with the time it will take to form a new government, write a new constitution, elect a new parliament, swear a new judiciary – the removal of Mubarak was lightening fast.

Can a citizenry so impatient for their human rights and freedom be content to wait and get it right? We must also remember that a corrupt system works only if it has the necessary complement of conspirators. Those participants in the Mubarak regime who operated with an open palm on one hand and a truncheon in the other will not go quietly if at all. They will be circling the new Egyptian order waiting to see how they can game the new system and make it pay as well as the old one. Others will be looking for their own path to power.

Can thirty years of “emergency” dictatorial rule give way to checks and balances? There is much work to be done.

Soon, the international cameras will leave Tahrir Square. The euphoria of victory will evaporate and the vacuum will need to be filled. Will the world keep vigil over Egypt and help keep it on the path to a democratic government that best serves the people of Egypt?

The hope is that a people who formed a human chain to keep looters from destroying the treasures of its past, will form a new government to safeguard the treasure that is Egypt’s future.

Felicia Knight is President of Knight Vision International, LLC: www.KnightVisionInternational.com

Image: Sawtak Online