A couple of years ago, I blogged about the New York Times’s decision not to use the word “tweet” in the context of Twitter. It was a classic case of denial – a refusal to acknowledge the oncoming train headed straight for the old platform.
Now we have the Associated Press and several respected dictionaries orchestrating a grammatical train wreck. Hyperbole? Perhaps. But we’re already on board that metaphor so let’s keep chugging. The Washington Post reported recently on the AP’s approval of the use of the adverb “hopefully” for “it is hoped” in addition to the established “in a hopeful manner.”
It’s one thing for word usage in conversation to devolve into disjuncts (clearly, frankly, and most annoying among them: “most importantly”), but quite another for respected purveyors of English language rules to sanction poor grammar.
Just because people say “It’s not too bad of a day” (the criminal, ubiquitous insertion of “of” is worth a blog of its own), or “The ship sunk two miles off shore,” or “He needs 60 votes or less to win” doesn’t make them correct. Just because more and more people use words incorrectly more and more often, doesn’t make the act any more acceptable. If anything, it makes it less so.
I understand the argument that languages are always evolving. Sumer is no longer icumen in, after all. Words are invented or lost, meanings change. The rules of language and grammar, however, are there to give structure, underscore meaning, as well as orchestrate melody and cadence.
Rules, of course, can be broken. When writing dialogue or dialect – or a blog – there is more leeway. Writing in a conversational manner often demands the rules are tossed out altogether. What we shouldn’t do is say there are no rules because no one’s following them – or teaching them.
I’ve disagreed with the AP Stylebook before. I favor the serial comma. AP advises against it. I use apostrophe “s” at the end of proper nouns ending with “s.” AP advises an apostrophe only. Even though I’m a former journalist, I grew up on Strunk & White. By the time I saw an AP Stylebook, I was already indoctrinated.
Given that the AP, the Oxford English Dictionary, Webster’s New World College Dictionary, and the American Heritage Dictionary all have bowed to “hopefully,” I’m pretty sure the aforementioned train has left the station. It is hoped, however, some will let it pass them by.
Felicia Knight is President of Knight Vision International, LLC
Image by Mactitioner












